Skip to content

Conversation

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jan 12, 2026

I just noticed that we have 50k+ PRs marked as waiting on bors, even though they have been merged, lol.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 12, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 12, 2026

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

I kinda thought that was intentional since it was always like this, never occurred to me that this wasn't :D

r? me @bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 12, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors bot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 12, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 12, 2026

📌 Commit 3ca709c has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@Urgau
Copy link
Member

Urgau commented Jan 12, 2026

Should we do a mass removal?

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jan 12, 2026

We could, yeah. Although it's not really that important I guess.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jan 12, 2026

Btw for this to work fully in new bors, we'll have to also remove this label from all PRs that were merged in a rollup. Have it in my TODO list.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Jan 12, 2026

Should we do a mass removal?

Probably not worth the effort lol, it's not like it matters that much I don't think?

@Urgau
Copy link
Member

Urgau commented Jan 12, 2026

Triagebot could also also learn to remove unnecessary labels.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #150861 (Folding/`ReErased` cleanups)
 - #150869 (Emit error instead of delayed bug when meeting mismatch type for const tuple)
 - #150920 (Use a hook to decouple `rustc_mir_transform` from `rustc_mir_build`)
 - #150941 (rustc_parse_format: improve diagnostics for unsupported python numeric grouping)
 - #150972 (Rename EII attributes slightly (being consistent in naming things foreign items, not extern items))
 - #150980 (Use updated indexes to build reverse map for delegation generics)
 - #150986 (std: Fix size returned by UEFI tcp4 read operations)
 - #150996 (Remove `S-waiting-on-bors` after a PR is merged)

r? @ghost
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #150861 (Folding/`ReErased` cleanups)
 - #150869 (Emit error instead of delayed bug when meeting mismatch type for const tuple)
 - #150920 (Use a hook to decouple `rustc_mir_transform` from `rustc_mir_build`)
 - #150941 (rustc_parse_format: improve diagnostics for unsupported python numeric grouping)
 - #150972 (Rename EII attributes slightly (being consistent in naming things foreign items, not extern items))
 - #150980 (Use updated indexes to build reverse map for delegation generics)
 - #150986 (std: Fix size returned by UEFI tcp4 read operations)
 - #150996 (Remove `S-waiting-on-bors` after a PR is merged)

r? @ghost
@JayanAXHF JayanAXHF added the T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jan 12, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit db4c095 into rust-lang:main Jan 12, 2026
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
Rollup merge of #150996 - bors-merged-label, r=jieyouxu

Remove `S-waiting-on-bors` after a PR is merged

I just noticed that we have 50k+ PRs marked as waiting on bors, even though they have been merged, lol.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Jan 12, 2026
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the bors-merged-label branch January 12, 2026 20:16
@Kobzol Kobzol removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 12, 2026
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#150861 (Folding/`ReErased` cleanups)
 - rust-lang/rust#150869 (Emit error instead of delayed bug when meeting mismatch type for const tuple)
 - rust-lang/rust#150920 (Use a hook to decouple `rustc_mir_transform` from `rustc_mir_build`)
 - rust-lang/rust#150941 (rustc_parse_format: improve diagnostics for unsupported python numeric grouping)
 - rust-lang/rust#150972 (Rename EII attributes slightly (being consistent in naming things foreign items, not extern items))
 - rust-lang/rust#150980 (Use updated indexes to build reverse map for delegation generics)
 - rust-lang/rust#150986 (std: Fix size returned by UEFI tcp4 read operations)
 - rust-lang/rust#150996 (Remove `S-waiting-on-bors` after a PR is merged)

r? @ghost
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants